First off, before all the Hamilton fans get mad, let me give some kudos to Lewis for not playing it safe and settling for a second place which would have been very good for his championship quest. It was a great race and a great antidote for the horribly dull Valencia race.
Now to the question of the day.
Below is a clip of Hamilton's pass on Kimi Raikkonen which was put under investigation. There are two ways of looking at it.
Mclaren will argue that Hamilton did let Raikkonen back in front and thus gained no advantage. Ferrari will argue that if Hamilton had taken the corner he would never have been close enough to out-brake Raikkonen into La Source.
I don't like to see a race decided in court but I have to agree that Hamilton gained an advantage by his actions and everything that happened later was influenced by it.
What do you think?
